Info

You are currently browsing the archives for the Malware category.

August 2010
S M T W T F S
« Apr    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
Links

Archive for the Malware Category

Sun/Oracle Makes About-Face about patching Java

A serious vulnerability exists in Java and Sun has known about this vulnerability since around April 9th. This exploit can occur because the Java Browser Plugin  is running “javaws.exe” without validating command-line parameters.  Last week, when confronted about the problem, Oracle said they did not consider this vulnerability to be of high enough priority to break their quarterly patch cycle.

A U.S.-based Web site, Songlyrices.com was compromised by attackers, and was redirecting visitors to a Russian server feeding the Java attack as well as other exploits.

Now that users have started reporting that they are being infected by the drive-by Java attacks, Oracle has changed its mind and issued a patch.  If you haven’t already patched this vulnerability you can download Java software at http://www.java.com/en/download/index.jsp

Avast: “New Threat: Malvertising”

Malware that exploits holes in popular applications is being delivered by big ad delivery platforms including those run by Yahoo, Fox, and Google, according to Prague-based antivirus firm Avast.

Malware has previously been found in ads running on normally trustworthy sites like The New York Times, the Drudge Report.com, TechCrunch and WhitePages.com. The practice has been dubbed “malvertising.”

Researchers at Avast say some large ad delivery systems including Yahoo’s Yield Manager and Fox Audience Network’s Fimserve.com (together they cover more than 50 percent of online ads), and to a much smaller degree Google’s DoubleClick, are delivering much of the Malvertising. In addition, some of the malicious ads ended up on Yahoo and Google sites, Avast claims.

“It’s not just the small players but the ad servers connected with Google and Yahoo have been infected and served up bad ads,” said Lyle Frink, public relations manager for Avast.

The most compromised ad delivery systems were Yield Manager and Fimserve, but a number of smaller ad systems, including Myspace, were also found to be delivering malware on a lesser scale, Avast Virus Labs said.

In these cases, JavaScript code that Avast dubbed “JS:Prontexi,” was found in ads delivered from those networks. Avast researcher Jiri Sejtko said this is a Trojan in script form that targets the Windows operating system.

It trys to find vulnerabilities in Adobe Reader and Acrobat, Java, QuickTime, and Flash and launches fake antivirus warnings when it does find them, Sejtko said. “The Google portion of JS:Prontexi is quite small and has gotten visibly even smaller as Google has taken steps to improve the situation,” Sejtko said. “That is not the case with Yahoo and Fox.”

Users don’t need to click on anything to get infected; a computer becomes infected immediately after the ad is loaded by the browser, Avast said.

Since the malware started spreading in late December, Avast has registered more than 2.6 million instances of it on customers’ computers.

This same post is available on my local blog at http://www.networkingdelaware.com/blogpage.html

Recent BitDefender update makes 64bit Windows un-bootable

The Antivirus vendor, BitDefender, recently released a damaged update that marks legitimate Windows and BitDefender files as malicious. BitDefender will then quarantine these files identifying them as “Trojan.FakeAlert.5” resulting in Windows becoming un-bootable.

This faulty update only effects the 64-bit versions of Windows and furthermore the update had to occur between 8am and 11:30am on the March 20th

The company has released a press release containing fixes for the various versions located here.

The company released this message:

“On behalf of BitDefender, we are very sorry for the problems that our update may have caused. We have also released a solution to this issue, for all affected users, we invite you to access it here:


http://www.bitdefender.com/site/KnowledgeBase/consumer/#638- home users


http://www.bitdefender.com/site/KnowledgeBase/consumer/#643- BitDefender Business Client users


http://www.bitdefender.com/site/KnowledgeBase/consumer/#642- Bitdefender Security for File Server users

Another “Day Zero” Balancing Act…

I feel kinda lucky I am able to write this blog entry… or at least to upload it to this site… This morning I woke up, fired up the old laptop, clicked on IE7 … and …. nothing.  Everything just kept timing out.
Huh… what to do…what to do… I tried different browsers…Firefox, Opera, Safari, Polstergeist… same ole … same ole…

The first troubleshooting step I tried was ipconfig… Yep… I did indeed have a valid IP address all right, and in the right range too…huh… Let’s try…  ipconfig /release;  ipconfig /flushdns;  ipconfig /renew… I got the same IP address I originally had and the same problem too… No web browsing happening here.

Then I tried pinging one of the web sites for my Delaware network support company;  good old www.adminassociates.com …. Huh… weirder and weirder… no lost packets… ping works, so apparently the DNS server is servin’ too but still, browsers don’t work.

Then I tried disabling my Zonealarm Pro Firewall (but turned on the Windows firewall, just in case).  Wow… the browser now works fine… so what’s up with Zonealarm?  I looked at everything and nothing seemed out of  spec. I felt it was odd since this particular firewall has never a problem for me… very reliable; very easy to configure…very trustworthy.  I re-enabled  Zonealarm, disabled the Windows firewall, moved the “Internet Zone” slider down from high to medium and the browser started working again. Move the slider back up and the browser stopped working again.

Like I said… weirder and weirder…so it’s definitely a Zonealarm problem, but why…What could have happened?   Aha… yes… two days ago was patch Tuesday. I’ll have to Google this, but first, what else I need to find out what else is happening in my world.

I went back to my working combo of Windows Firewall on and Zonealarm off and started my email client.  About the third message I received was from Microsoft talking about a major bulletin revision … not a patch revision mind you, just the bulletin:

Bulletin Information:
=====================

* MS08-037 - Important

- http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms08-037.mspx
- Reason for Revision: V2.0 (July 10, 2008): Bulletin revised to
inform users of ZoneAlarm and Check Point Endpoint Security
of an Internet connectivity issue detailed in the section

So, in the final analysis, downloading a newer version of Zonealarm (that apparently wasn’t available before today) solved my problem, but can you imagine if this happened at a corporate office with a couple hundred workstations?

I know not too many offices use Zonealarm, but what if they did?  What a pain to update 200 workstations, in emergency mode (read pressure), and probably with the expectation that it would (could) be completed in one morning.

This is just another example of why all patches should be thoroughly tested on a lab unit before being put into a production environment.

Now, I became a victim by not following my own advice, but that was on my personal laptop.  I create an image of the drive at least every couple of days and sync important files to my basement server so I am never in danger of losing too much, but it’s a real balancing act when you are responsible for for than your own machine.

On one hand, you want to wait for version 2 of all the patches… let someone else report the pain…and at the same time you know “Day Zero” is a real threat and today might just be that day.

I always make sure I get a really good full backup, especially on Monday nights… just in case.

Good luck and good networking !

From way down in the trenches…. I’m Tom

 

 

Custom Search

Opps, they did it again…

I just read an article about another 51,000 credit card numbers going into the wind… See the article here

These stories scare the bejeebies out of me… I guess it’s a “there, but for the grace of  God, go I” kind of thing.  How would I know if someone has my credit card information?  Apparently the company that bought the rights to the Montgomery Ward name didn’t feel it was important enough to let their unlucky customers know.

I wonder if someone has any of my financial information.  I am pretty sure there is no key-logger installed on any of my own computers…make that 99.999% sure, but not 100% sure.

Since I constantly work with other people’s data, I am especially sensitive to the possibilities and careful to stay as infection-free as humanly possible.  But since I am human, I can’t be 100% certain… No one can. Firewalls, anti-virus, anti-spyware, and Trojan remover software…all of these things stand guard between me and thee, but is it enough?  Who knows?

As we move out from my semi-controlled environment and into the technological wilderness of my client’s accounts, I become more and more concerned.

At my Wilmington Delaware network support company, we always spend extra time stressing to our clients just how important safe surfing and safe-email practices can be.  We spin a lot of  “what if” tales to illustrate just what can happen if you let your guard down for even a minute.

We’ll take a computer with a new, unpatched installation of XP and set it in the client’s DMZ, then check it a couple of hours later. Almost every time you’ll find that the available free drive space has shrunk by 2 to 3 gigs. This is  a great argument for when a client thinks they are too small to be of interest to a hacker. There just “ain’t no such animal” as an installation that is of no interest to a hacker.

We monitor our clients’ anti-malware installations and make sure the signature files get updated daily. We check the status of the firmware of the hardware firewalls daily. We make sure that all available patches are up-to-date (after checking them for unexpected results).  We run Snort intrusion detection on our larger clients.  We train.  We explain. We do pen testing.  And still, I worry if some client is giving away the keys to the kingdom… right now.. this very minute.

Drive-By Infections… The Innocent Suffer… The Guilty Rejoyce.

For quite some time now, hackers have been infecting web sites with malicious code by using SQL injection and iframe injection attacks. This operation is usually performed at, or right before the times when traffic is historically at a high for the day, thereby infecting the greatest number of visitors.

Unfortunately, you do not have to do anything particularly dumb to become infected.  If you navigate to one of these infected sites you will get an infection from embedded malware scripts.  This is commonly referred to as a “drive-by” infection.

I say you don’t have to do anything dumb because the sites I am discussing here aren’t porn sites, or ‘warz and serialz” sites…going to those sites would definitely qualify as dumb. No, they are often  some of the most popular and well known sites on the net… even news, weather, and public information sites

I provide Delaware Network Support all over the state and the surrounding areas. When you have this kind of business, you run into all kinds of infections.  Sometimes the users know they are infected, but most times I only find the infection when looking for reasons for poor performance or odd happenings.

This is where a really good anti-malware program comes in,   AVG 8, for instance, installs a component called “link Scanner” that blocks infected websites and checks links on search engines for these threats.

I suggest you check it our, and sooner than later.  Who knows… your favorite site may be next to fall to the black hats.

Good Luck and Good Networking

From way down in the trenches… Tom

 

 

Custom Search

These Days, Malware Plays Hide ‘n Seek

I was recently reading about yet another security breach that has been discovered. This time, a supermarket chain in the Northeast says that in excess of 4 million credit card numbers have been exposed… Here’s the story.

However, stories like this are no longer a big surprise… through newspaper headlines and the six o’clock news, we have been made aware of such breaches happening to the likes of TJ Max, Google, and the United States Navy. I am just amazed that it doesn’t happen more often… or does it?

Malware today is focused on financial gain. Long gone are the days when virus writers simply tried to outdo each other for big glitzy headlines. Today, stealth and guile are the more important attributes of a successful attack. By not making its presence known, the malware just sits there, day in and day out, communicating with the bot master, sending him, or her, our credit card numbers, bank account information, passwords, Social Security numbers and everything else we hold dear.

I wouldn’t be at all surprised to find that 90% of the fortune 500 systems are infected by bot-net Trojans and worms.

If I were the author, I would go about it a little differently. I would write a multi-tiered Trojan with dozens of versions that are significantly different; much like a polymorphic virus.

My hypothetical Trojan would just sit there until a specific date and time, synchronized through NTP, then activate all copies at once. This concerted effort would be intended to initially overwhelm the system. As the victims became aware of the Trojan, and a method became available to remove it, the next tier would discover that fact and start its own activation timer.  That way, by not activating immediately, it wouldn’t be as likely to be discovered in the recheck that inevitably follows a disinfection process. People forget quickly, it seems.  When a certain time had elapsed the process would start all over again until all tiers had fired and delivered their payloads.

How do these units get infected in the first place? Who knows?  While the most expected method is email delivery and removable media, there are so many other avenues of attack it is almost impossible to defend against them all. Not every infection comes from visiting porn sites or pirating software and serial numbers. There are now traditionally legitimate websites that have been hacked and infected. Just browsing to one of these sites can result in a “drive-by” infection.

The way most infections are discovered are by traditional signature-based anti-malware programs, due mostly to their prevalence in the marketplace.. Unfortunately, by the time the malware is discovered, the signatures written and the updated signatures distributed and installed, much of the damage has already been done. This is commonly referred to as a “Zero Day Attack” and accounts for more and more malware damage.  That’s why I usually suggest anti-malware programs that work on the so-called “whitelist” principle of allowing known clean programs to run and denying those that can not be validated, whether infected or not. It may be a little more inconvenient, but then again so is identity theft or having your bank account drained.

Go here to download an ebook on malware.

Next time… What IS the best defense?

Good Luck and Good Computing.

From way down in the trenches… Tom

Custom Search

|